Chernobyl
It
all started in the 1970s, when the USSR built two nuclear plants on the
banks of the meandering Dniepr River in its wide floodplain of marshes
and birch and pine forests, by the northern Ukraine border with Belarus
and Russia. By 1983, two more reactors were completed, part of a grand
plan to construct eight in all. But reactor four lasted only three
years, and the remainder would never be built. On April 26th
1986, the catastrophic Chernobyl accident occurred, now known to be a
result mostly of human error. Some staff at the plant were conducting a
test to check the plant’s capacity to continue to provide electrical
power to the cooling system under conditions of a sudden loss of power.
Unfortunately, they do not tell the operators of the nuclear part of the
plant, and the combination of a series of unlikely events and decisions
lead suddenly to an uncontrollable power surge, resulting in two violent
explosions at 1.23 am. The 1000 tonne sealing cap is blown off the
plant, the reactor is destroyed, and the melting of the fuel rods at
2000o C cause the graphite cooling rods themselves to catch
fire. A plume of fissile material – gases, aerosols, and six tonnes of
fragmented fuel – reaches a kilometre into the sky, and leads eventually
to the deposition of radioactive material across the whole of the
northern hemisphere.
And since then, Chernobyl has entered the psyche of people worldwide
(though incorrectly spelled: it is Chornobyl locally). An industrial
disaster of the greatest possible magnitude. The incompetence of people
and safety mechanisms. The health consequences born not by political
leaders and technocrats, but by common people. No wonder, then, that
international political pressure led to the closure of all the remaining
nuclear reactors by the end of the year 2000. But it is here that fact
and fiction start to diverge. Chernobyl has now emerged as a site of
ecological recovery in the almost complete absence of people. And
neither are the health effects as expected – these are mostly social and
psychological rather than caused directly by radiation. The acute
effects were limited to the heroic firefighters, who of course had
little personal choice at the time.
Today, you approach the Ukrainian exclusion zone from the east by
crossing the blue-green Dniepr marshes, and passing through a finger of
Belarus. At the checkpoints, young immigration officers in light green
uniforms and aggressively peaked caps check and stamp every piece of
paper several times, and in the fullness of time let the car pass.
Ahead, a roe deer scampers across the road, which then sweeps from the
forests to cross the great cooling ponds, now home to giant two-metre
catfish. The exclusion zone itself is now the subject of a unique
experiment on what happens when people leave. When civilisations end,
and people disperse or die off, what then happens to nature? What
happens, too, to the few people who might survive?
 |
 |
|
|
You come into the
town of Pripyat along a street crowded with silver birches. This
former town of 49,000 people is now an eyrie reminder of how
civilisation treads on thin ice. One day it is a vibrant city, then
it is abandoned. Today, there are only ghosts in the crumbling
infrastructure. One day it will be completely overrun by nature,
lost in the forests, perhaps to be discovered in the future by
amazed archaeologists as were Tikal, Machu Picchu and Angkor Wat. We
park in the central square, a light wind rustling the birch and
poplars, raising a worrisome dust on a day of sparkling sunshine and
azure sky. Some street surfaces are clear and grey, as patrols do
pass on occasions. But everywhere else, the green of trees, grass
and flowering plants dominates. |
 |
|
In one meadow,
grown up over paving stones, local scientist Igor Chernivsky and I
count some forty species of plants in flower. Sergey Gachuk, of the
Radioecology Laboratory in Slavutych, has recorded 226 species in
Pripyat alone. Walking across the main square towards the grand
steps and wide windows of the Palace of Culture, we see the clumped
droppings of moose. In the old fountains, a reed bed has
established, and red dragonflies and neon-blue mayflies flit across
the water. Above, swifts swoop and chitter. We crunch over broken
glass, and into blocks of flats and official buildings. A case for a
trumpet lies forlornly, a child’s stuffed toy on the stairs. The
temptation is to gather up some of the smaller items of this modern
archaeology, a film strip or old pens, but then you remember they
are likely to be hot, and so best remain. Memories are safe, but
artefacts are likely not. |
 |
|
Silver birch has
sprouted along the upper balcony of the palace of culture, and are
beginning to fill the spaces formerly taken by huge plate glass
windows. There is something strange about the glass. It is all
broken, and clearly not by the blast of the accident. Vandals must
have later come to cause this damage. Perhaps some latent desire by
we moderns to destroy our own civilisation, acts that can be
undertaken with impunity as there are no police or citizenry to stop
such actions. A vandal’s paradise. We push through tall grass meadow
to come upon a seemingly ancient theme park, rusty rides, peeling
faded paint, rotten wood, and a great ferris wheel with yellow
silent cabins, bright against the sky. You turn around once, and
then again, and there is only silence. Open spaces, concrete riding
up where the roots of an apple tree are bursting out. The purples,
reds, blues and yellows of flowers are everywhere. |
 |
| |
| |
| |
We climb the 16
stories of the tallest block of flats, first fighting our way through
thick vegetation to reach the hidden front porch. A door hangs on a
broken hinge, and we crunch up the crumbling stairs, flakes of pale
green paint covering every surface. Up we go, counting the floors and
trying not to breathe too deeply for fear of inhaling the dust, until we
find a ladder in a dark loft. The rusty door creaks, and then gives way,
and we are on the roof. And here the view takes our breath away. On the
east horizon, the River Pripyat and cooling ponds, the power plant
complex standing tall beyond the town. On the other three horizons, the
forests of pine, willow and birch stretch away. Before the accident, a
fifth of the region was forested, now it is 80%. This reminds me vividly
of climbing the Mayan Temple of the Giant Jaguar at Tikal, and emerging
from the rainforest to gaze down on the tree tops full of howler and
spider monkeys, stretching away in a sea of green to Belize and Mexico.
Here, we look down on roads cramped by invading grass, trees sprouting
through concrete. Rows of flats march into the distance, every one of
them empty.
From horizon to
horizon, the land is green. The city is tiny by comparison. After the
accident, people had to leave in a day or two of utter chaos, and now
all is serene. And in this way civilisation is abandoned. Will it be
like this elsewhere in the world? What will it be like when our numbers
fall, or when climate change affects the viability of some regions?
Settlements will surely be abandoned, whole suburbs forgotten, towns
where economic activity dries up will be left to nature. Perhaps Pripyat
is the first of many to come during the next couple of centuries. Which,
then, are doomed? We have never had to ask such questions. No
civilisation ever conceives of its own failure, of the likelihood of
departure, of abandonment to nature. And we will have to face nature
anew as it reinvades. If whole ecosystems arrive, then they will bring
predators too. Perhaps there will be no problems – but ask how people
feel in India on the edge of national parks where tigers are now
abundant, or those in Boulder, Colorado, where mountain lions have
reinvaded urban areas, or indeed the people of this exclusion zone,
where wolves eat the domestic dogs as they are easy prey. Or perhaps by
then we will have wreaked such harm on certain parts of nature that
there will be little left to invade.
Later, we walk
through villages hanging onto their own histories. After the accident,
all the domestic animals were rounded up and shot, and the people
trucked off to distant cities. Some came back, and strangely enough they
seem happy. An 81 year old, Anastasia, her headscarf and blouse a riot
of flower-design and smile of silver and gold, recalls her 60 years of
marriage in this village. She was sad at first that only twenty people
came back to the village formerly of 2000 people, but now she says she
feels fine. She has land, a pig and some cows, and friends. The children
sometimes come up from the south, and they eat and sing songs. An old
man and his wife, Vassily and Maria, were both born in their village
more than seventy years ago, and now they are the youngest in the
village. They sit under the shade of an apple tree by the empty road,
and complain about the lack of transport. This gnarled man, with stubble
half-shorn, teeth at all angles, with the blue serge jacket of peasants
the world over. They like it here because it is home. They like to talk
too, as no one ever comes this way except for those making occasional
and clumsy attempts to remove them.
|
We walk across a
farm with Hannah, as she darts between potatoes and peas in
brightly-coloured slippers. She grows cabbage and carrot, maize and
onion, red and white beets, squashes and courgettes, and spindly
tomatoes. She has two pigs – one is to be killed at the new year
celebrations. All villagers still gather plants and animals from the
forests, and should leave the hot mushrooms and berries alone, but
do not – they like them too much. They are approaching their own end
times, and have come to terms with the patchy and invisible threat
of radiation. |
 |
|
But the children
will not come back, and new people will not move here. These
forgotten people seem happy and content, living where their
identities have been shaped over centuries. But soon each village
will steadily decline in numbers, until the last woman or man
standing has it all to themselves. How will they feel? What will
they do then? Move to another village, or simply wait? We walk into
the abandoned wooden houses, with glassed-in verandas at the
entrances, kitchens centred on great stoves attached to raised bed
platforms to keep warm in winter. Some windows are broken, but fewer
than in Pripyat. |
 |
A
vine twists around a window, an ancient pear tree hangs branches across
a roof, currant bushes run wild in the yard, a pigsty roof has
collapsed, great banks of nettles thrive on nutrient-rich soils. The
roofs of some buildings are made of flaky asbestos, probably more
hazardous to health than the local sources of radiation. It is warm
today, but in the middle of winter it will be bitterly cold, and people
will huddle around their stoves and let their local vodka warm them from
the inside. And they will count the winters away until they, too, are
gone.
|